An informal non intimidating way for explaining God’s existence around the “water cooler” work environment?
Helping you navigate the issues on faith, culture and everything else
An informal non intimidating way for explaining God’s existence around the “water cooler” work environment?
by Rob Lundberg The question posed here is one that harbors an exclusive tone. “What is the difference between Christ’s exclusivity” implies that the burden
by Rob Lundberg WHAT IS THE FIRST PRINCIPLE OF LOGIC? The first principle of all knowledge is the law of noncontradiction. This foundational first principle of
by Rob Lundberg Some folks think that morals are set forth by the culture. Just ask Nazi Germany or modern day Liberia where gangs are
by Rob Lundberg It has actually been a while since I have been into my counter-cult toolbox. You see, when I first got into apologetics
“Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness. . . So God created mankind in his own image, in the
by Rob Lundberg Thinking about how we come to know what we know (epistemology[1]), and seeing the condition of the church in America operating more
Could complex speech and abstract thinking evolved by blind chance? Many years ago, this was a question I had and now pose, in conversations with atheists who believe that macroevolution is “fact.” This post is going to investigate the question of complex speech and abstract thinking and show that these characteristics come by way of design and not by random blind chance processes, known as evolution.
Dr. Norman Geisler became probably the greatest influence to show me that there was more to apologetics than Ken Ham and the popular creation versus evolution debate.
If you are holding to a liberal view of morality, you are going to vote for the candidate that best fits your views. If you are holding to more of a conservative stances on the aforementioned issues, then you are going to vote for the candidate that best fits you conservative values.
So please do not say, “Don’t push your morality on me!” Because when we do vote, we are voting for the candidate that best lines up with our moral underpinnings. And when you cast your vote, guess what you have just done?
There is no escape hatch for not legislating morality. We do it all the time. And the flip side of the coin is that I still thank God for those who don’t hold to an absolute standard and yet act morally.
There are many questions that are a challenge to the Christian faith, but this one came up the other night in a group that our family fellowships with. The person asking it during our group meeting really put some thought into it, and it is one worth our posting a response to it. Perhaps you have heard this one as well. Here is the question:
If God has infinite knowledge, WHY did He create beings that He foreknew would sin and then sacrifice His Son to redeem them?
The origin of this objection comes from the influential German philosopher, Ludwig Feuerbach who pontificated this idea that God was made in the image of man and that God was a creation of the human mind. And then Sigmund Freud also contributed to this “A theological dogma might be refuted to a person a thousand times, provided however, he had need of it, he again and again accepts it as true.”