An informal non intimidating way for explaining God’s existence around the “water cooler” work environment?
Helping you navigate the issues on faith, culture and everything else
An informal non intimidating way for explaining God’s existence around the “water cooler” work environment?
by Rob Lundberg The question posed here is one that harbors an exclusive tone. “What is the difference between Christ’s exclusivity” implies that the burden
by Rob Lundberg WHAT IS THE FIRST PRINCIPLE OF LOGIC? The first principle of all knowledge is the law of noncontradiction. This foundational first principle of
by Rob Lundberg The other day at work, I was involved in a discussion with someone who asked me about what was the reason for
by Rob Lundberg Have you ever been called “intolerant” or “narrow minded” or even worse, “bigoted” because you believe in absolute truth? The charges of
by Rob Lundberg Some folks think that morals are set forth by the culture. Just ask Nazi Germany or modern day Liberia where gangs are
by Rob Lundberg Whenever you’re involved in a conversation with a well-meaning believer and the word “revelation” comes into the conversation, it can create some
by Rob Lundberg It has actually been a while since I have been into my counter-cult toolbox. You see, when I first got into apologetics
“Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness. . . So God created mankind in his own image, in the
by Rob Lundberg Thinking about how we come to know what we know (epistemology[1]), and seeing the condition of the church in America operating more
Could complex speech and abstract thinking evolved by blind chance? Many years ago, this was a question I had and now pose, in conversations with atheists who believe that macroevolution is “fact.” This post is going to investigate the question of complex speech and abstract thinking and show that these characteristics come by way of design and not by random blind chance processes, known as evolution.
Dr. Norman Geisler became probably the greatest influence to show me that there was more to apologetics than Ken Ham and the popular creation versus evolution debate.